Services
SERVICES
SOLUTIONS
TECHNOLOGIES
Industries
Insights
TRENDING TOPICS
INDUSTRY-RELATED TOPICS
OUR EXPERTS
The customer faced a future steep cost increase for their Jira and Confluence instances and was looking for ways to reduce these expenses. Itransition helped the customer evaluate Atlassian alternatives and provided them with two distinct action plans to reduce their Atlassian TCO.
The customer is a non-profit center for scientific research. For 10+ years, they have been using Atlassian Confluence and Jira, utilized by 15,000+ distributed users from institutions across 40 countries.
Industry
Non-profit
Specialization
Scientific research
Geography
Operating across 40+ countries
The customer faced a 15x yearly cost increase for all Jira instances and an 8x increase for Confluence instances in use due to a significant rise in prices for Atlassian products. To avoid the increase in costs, the customer wanted to consider other options and needed a consulting partner to advise them on both the Atlassian products ecosystem and other off-the-shelf collaboration tools on the market.
We reviewed multiple alternatives to Jira and Confluence, creating a rating system to compare the tools based on the customer’s requirements, and proposed the two best scenarios for the customer to implement to meet their TCO reduction goals.
We began by gathering initial information about the company and its processes, as well as the customer’s requirements and expectations. We also interviewed the customer’s procurement team to collect the details about the existing Atlassian billing terms and existing Jira and Confluence configurations and customizations.
By the end of the discovery stage, we had lists of high-level, specific requirements for the desired solutions:
The customer also provided mandatory and optional features specific for both project management and content management products that we used for the selected products’ comparison.
We conducted two rounds of solutions’ review and held checkpoint meetings at the end of each with the customer. During the first review round, we picked 30 solutions for issue tracking and 20 solutions for content management that fit the customer’s high-level requirements.
In the second review round, we studied these solutions against the mandatory and optional requirements to shortlist four alternatives for issue tracking and three solutions for content management. Then, we conducted deep research, aligning the functionality of the selected products with the customer’s specific requirements.
Our consultants created a comparison matrix with tools’ pros and cons, as well as the rating based on the following criteria:
Each criterion was then broken down into weighted areas and given a 1/ 0.75/ 0.5/ 0.25 or 0 rating. The summarized ratings of products showed how well the solutions correspond to the set requirements. Finally, we presented the extended evaluation report, the products’ demo, and comparison results to the customer.
Taking into account the collected data, research results, and communications with the customer, Itransition came up with two options.
Since the customer is a non-profit organization, the best option would be to apply for a free Atlassian Data Center Community subscription.
The Atlassian Community license offers charitable non-profit organizations self-managed Data Center licensing at zero cost and a 75% discount on cloud subscriptions. Eligible organizations are non-commercial, non-government, non-political, non-academic, and those without religious affiliation. To obtain the Community license, organizations need to submit application forms with answers to basic questions about their activity and values.
Therefore, if the customer continued using Atlassian, they could keep the existing Atlassian setup for significant cost savings and avoid data migration and user training costs. To cut annual admin Jira and Confluence TCO, we also recommended Jira instances consolidation.
Another option is migrating to YouTrack to replace Jira for issue-tracking and switch from Confluence to XWiki for content management. For this option, we provided detailed product descriptions and demos, installation instructions, a step-by-step migration plan, and roundabouts for implementing mandatory features that aren’t supported out of the box.
Additionally, we calculated migration costs and timelines, 10-year TCO (counting in a 5% inflation rate and loyalty discounts), and provided a list of technology partners to support product adoption.
Itransition performed a 360-degree alternative product evaluation of a switch from Jira and Confluence and proposed two ways of reducing their Atlassian licensing spend. The implementation of our recommendations is expected to result in:
01
02
Service
Get professional assistance from an Atlassian platform partner to set up, deploy & customize Atlassian apps in the cloud or on-premises in line with your needs.
Service
Reduce the cost of your Atlassian products by 30-40% by adjusting your Atlassian setup with our certified experts.
Case study
Learn how we optimized the company’s Jira and JSM solutions and performed license management, helping it increase request processing capacity and reduce costs.
Case study
Find out how Itransition implemented Jira Service Desk Cloud and migrated legacy data to it for IATA, an aerospace trade association.
Case study
Learn how Itransition optimized legacy ITMS processes and migrated Atlassian Jira and Confluence instances to the cloud for a fintech provider.
Case study
Find out how Itransition delivered a Jira-based incident management system for an oil and gas company.
Case study
Read about Itransition’s 10+ years long cooperation with a US-based multinational to create their flagship pharmaceutical data analytics products.
Case study
Learn how Itransition helped the Oracle Cloud consultant with Jira implementation to improve their agile software development project management.